A biased boint of view

Chapter 28A.640 and 642 RCW is the new discrimination law that is being forced on us, our schools and our children by Washington state. It sounds good, but as I went to the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) website, I saw that their way of accomplishing zero discrimination was to do away with bias.

Chapter 28A.640 and 642 RCW is the new discrimination law that is being forced on us, our schools and our children by Washington state. It sounds good, but as I went to the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) website, I saw that their way of accomplishing zero discrimination was to do away with bias.

In reading their “Washington Models for the Evaluation of Bias,”( a search for this on the OSPI website will bring up the PDF file), I noticed that the curriculum committees are to remove all bias from the teaching materials. They are charged with removing any bias from 15 different areas of life, like sexual orientation, gender, gender expression and family structure.

Who is completely unbiased? I realized the answer is no one! Bias has been a staple in humans since the beginning. But I do believe it’s possible to exchange one bias for another with instruction and education. To change the bias toward the family unit, they have to portray in the curriculum different kinds of family structures. They also have to portray different sexual attractions as normal and natural.

They are using the law to indoctrinate our children to become like themselves. By portraying sexual attractions like homosexual, bi-sexual, lesbian, transgender as normal …  and in all honesty, once you open that door, wouldn’t they still be biased if they didn’t include a whole lot more sexual deviancies as well?

Our schools are being forced to indoctrinate our children and grandchildren to a new bias.

It’s obvious we need to pay more attention to what laws our legislators are passing.

William Yucha

Port Angeles

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

What about the middle school?

I got my ballot for the upcoming School Bond election today (April 7). As I read about the school bond proposal, I saw one glaring omission in planning for the “large number of future students”: What happens in five years when these students graduate from elementary school and go to middle school?

Letter: Vote for Yacklin

My wife and I have known Kim Yacklin for over 20 years. She is exactly what we need in the Auditor's Office, someone who has a high level of understanding of the operations of the county and someone who has the integrity, professionalism and intelligence to run a department.

Letter: Think Positive

The local population, especially in Sequim, is intelligent, well-educated, mostly financially comfortable and old enough to appreciate the prosperity that used to be.

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?