Covering SARC’s financial tail

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

The Sequim Aquatic Recreational Center was built with good intentions to provide a community swimming pool for the health and safety of kids and adults. However, from the beginning, there’s been a misconception of self-sufficiency; this was an unfortunate statement of past considerations, causing consternation within the community. An observation: Of the tens of tens of thousands of public swimming pools in the U.S., for practicality, none are self-sufficient!

When economics were good, SARC saved (sometimes unwisely) and those savings kept SARC operating at industrial standards for the past 13 years without our tax monies. Recently, after professional inquiries into SARC’s structural, mechanical and financial health, it became apparent a levy, to supplement user fees, has to be asked. Without a levy (this is no threat) RCWs (Revised Code of Washington laws) state that SARC can’t run a deficit! If SARC can’t meet its pecuniary (financial) obligations, our community pool will be closed!

The management of our recreational center understands the difficulty of adding another burden on the community, but after deliberation, believes that a six-year levy, at a minimal cost of 12 cents per $1,000 (assessed valuation), is more than offset by the total social value SARC provides to the greater Sequim community.

We, the taxpayers and SARC’s management will have an opportunity to converse and exchange ideas at 5:30 p.m. July 23 in an open forum in SARC’s gym, 610 N. Fifth Ave.

Jan Richardson

Sequim

Richardson is a SARC board member.

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

This week’s letters to the editor

Read this week's "Letters to the Editor" in the green edition of the Sequim Gazette.

Letter: Beware of I-594

France had gun registration. World War II arrived. Germany invaded France, obtained the registration lists, stormed through the country picking up arms, if denied ownership, or refused they were executed on the spot.

Letter: Vote for Yacklin

My wife and I have known Kim Yacklin for over 20 years. She is exactly what we need in the Auditor's Office, someone who has a high level of understanding of the operations of the county and someone who has the integrity, professionalism and intelligence to run a department.