Covering SARC’s financial tail

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

The Sequim Aquatic Recreational Center was built with good intentions to provide a community swimming pool for the health and safety of kids and adults. However, from the beginning, there’s been a misconception of self-sufficiency; this was an unfortunate statement of past considerations, causing consternation within the community. An observation: Of the tens of tens of thousands of public swimming pools in the U.S., for practicality, none are self-sufficient!

When economics were good, SARC saved (sometimes unwisely) and those savings kept SARC operating at industrial standards for the past 13 years without our tax monies. Recently, after professional inquiries into SARC’s structural, mechanical and financial health, it became apparent a levy, to supplement user fees, has to be asked. Without a levy (this is no threat) RCWs (Revised Code of Washington laws) state that SARC can’t run a deficit! If SARC can’t meet its pecuniary (financial) obligations, our community pool will be closed!

The management of our recreational center understands the difficulty of adding another burden on the community, but after deliberation, believes that a six-year levy, at a minimal cost of 12 cents per $1,000 (assessed valuation), is more than offset by the total social value SARC provides to the greater Sequim community.

We, the taxpayers and SARC’s management will have an opportunity to converse and exchange ideas at 5:30 p.m. July 23 in an open forum in SARC’s gym, 610 N. Fifth Ave.

Jan Richardson

Sequim

Richardson is a SARC board member.

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 8, 2018

‘Resounding no’ on Carlsborg proposal This is a letter referring to an… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Aug. 1, 2018

Get out the vote, and vote for Wilke I want to encourage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 25, 2018

Fireworks restrictions make sense Presently Clallam County has no restrictions on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 18, 2018

Keep fireworks tradition alive in Clallam I am a resident of Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 11, 2018

Law-breakers should be ‘shown the door’ Ah, good old Bertha Cooper never… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 4, 2018

No true consensus on Sequim fireworks ban Well, if the city councilors… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 27, 2018

Politics, poorly played The present events at our southern border causes one… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Fireworks ban is a wise move We are writing to let you… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading