Letter: Of fear and freedom

In his letter to the editor (“Charter Review Commission choices important,” Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, Oct. 15, page A-12), Roger Fight could have been “forthcoming” by stating his chairmanship of the Clallam County Democrat Party.

Of fear and freedom

In his letter to the editor (“Charter Review Commission choices important,” Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, Oct. 15, page A-12), Roger Fight could have been “forthcoming” by stating his chairmanship of the Clallam County Democrat Party.

Possibly, he sought to avoid stunning many readers with his Democrat worries about wasting tax dollars? More likely, Fight fears loss of tax dollars and union control. Freedom is not free.

If the Sequim initiatives (or any process) liberates workers from union membership, progressives will lose funds for their endless destructive wealth redistribution schemes, union dues for supporting progressive candidates, or for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats destroying individual freedom, property rights and our free enterprise system.

Mr. Fight doesn’t disclose that without placement on the ballot as legally mandated, costs increase from $3,000 to approximately $30,000 for a special election. Instead, of adopting or allowing voters to vote, council members lawlessly declared the initiatives “illegal”—an authority no city official can claim.

Is Fight truthfully ignorant of this fact as he advances council members’ and progressives’ shameful promotion of this falsehood violating our democratic process?

In a Port O’Call advertisement, Fight’s recommended charter review candidates advertise as proponents of a “transparent process … and being responsive to the community.” Oops! This list includes three candidates (Councilmen Miller, Hays and Norma Turner) publicly opposing the transparency initiatives. Uh-oh!

Can we believe these candidates or Fight’s’ other listed candidates will be “responsive to the community” since these three “responsive” candidates ignored 654 initiative certified petition-signers and opposed a “transparent process” for contract negotiations? Uh-oh! Pinocchio?

Susan Shotthafer

Port Angeles

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 8, 2018

‘Resounding no’ on Carlsborg proposal This is a letter referring to an… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Aug. 1, 2018

Get out the vote, and vote for Wilke I want to encourage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 25, 2018

Fireworks restrictions make sense Presently Clallam County has no restrictions on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 18, 2018

Keep fireworks tradition alive in Clallam I am a resident of Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 11, 2018

Law-breakers should be ‘shown the door’ Ah, good old Bertha Cooper never… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 4, 2018

No true consensus on Sequim fireworks ban Well, if the city councilors… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 27, 2018

Politics, poorly played The present events at our southern border causes one… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Fireworks ban is a wise move We are writing to let you… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading