Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up

A couple months before election day, the Peninsula Daily News published a short letter to the editor explaining how the U.S. Government operates, i.e., “the president proposes and the Congress disposes.”

For the past six years, almost whatever the President proposed, the Congress summarily trashed (“disposed”), led by Sen. (Mitch) McConnell and Rep. (John) Boehner and their ilk.

But now, even though Washington state voted “blue,” many more states voted “red,” so Trump won the Electoral College vote but not the USA’s popular vote.

Some readers might not know that our democracy is based on checks and balances, honest disagreement and compromise among our elected leaders to achieve the best interests of and security for our nation and its citizens.

The following word picture exemplifies the adage: “Be careful what you wish for” — because there will be no checks and balances in the federal executive and legislative branches nor in the judicial branch, beginning in 2017.

That could leave us with the original intent of “All men are created equal,” which was “all property-owning white males are created equal.” All others (in 1791) had no rights.

From 1791-2012, USA’s citizens had progressed enormously in civil rights: electing a black president twice; women can vote, hold elective office, have a legal abortion; accepting gay marriages; widely accepting all minorities with rights to hold elective offices; and protection by The Rule of Law, to name a few.

I am seriously concerned that much of (all of?) our civil rights progress in 225 years for all our citizens and our Athenian democracy may be at risk.

With no checks and balances in our 2017 governmental system, one might ask, is the USA too big to fail? The Roman Empire thought so in 476 AD, as did the USSR in 1991.

The only checks and balances remaining for the people is the Fourth Estate. Question: Will this entity speak out to protect citizens’ civil rights?

Richard Hahn

Sequim

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

This week’s letters to the editor

Read this week's "Letters to the Editor" in the green edition of the Sequim Gazette.