Neighbors want ‘safety, justice, service’

Unlike the state of Colorado, Washington’s entrance into the recreational marijuana business has been totally chaotic!

Neighbors want ‘safety, justice, service’

Unlike the state of Colorado, Washington’s entrance into the recreational marijuana business has been totally chaotic!

Nowhere is this displayed more obviously than in our neighborhood at Cassidy Road, Sequim, where recently we were informed that a pot grow and process facility would be placed in our beautiful rural residential area.

Our first concerns are those of safety. There will be no one resident on the facility and security will be taken care of with an alarm system and cameras(?). Additionally the entrance to the facility is exactly opposite a school bus stop.

Secondly, this facility would require excessive amounts of water, high volume electricity, produces a pungent odor, is an ugly set of buildings and greenhouses not in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood and poses questions as to chemicals and fertilizers used, water drainage and disposal of hazardous materials.

This facility belongs in a commercial or light industrial area and not in a residential area. The quality of our lives will be undermined and we already have been informed that our property will be devalued exponentially. This is unjust.

Lastly, we have been treated badly by the Department of Community Development whose job it is to adhere to the rural law of providing freedom to areas with a low density rural setting from commercial, industrial and moderate density residential developments.

A hearing on this conditional permit granted to the applicant to establish this facility will be held in the courthouse on Aug. 13 and the presiding examiner will be Mark Nichols whose campaign pledge is, “Safety, Justice, Service” — exactly the three things county residents in residential settings are asking for regarding the pot business.

Kathryn McCready

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

What about the middle school?

I got my ballot for the upcoming School Bond election today (April 7). As I read about the school bond proposal, I saw one glaring omission in planning for the “large number of future students”: What happens in five years when these students graduate from elementary school and go to middle school?

Letter: Vote for Yacklin

My wife and I have known Kim Yacklin for over 20 years. She is exactly what we need in the Auditor's Office, someone who has a high level of understanding of the operations of the county and someone who has the integrity, professionalism and intelligence to run a department.

Letter: Think Positive

The local population, especially in Sequim, is intelligent, well-educated, mostly financially comfortable and old enough to appreciate the prosperity that used to be.

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?