Porter earns my vote

For years (usually at election time) certain people around here express misgivings and anger about the highly successful Pay-Or-Appear Program in Judge Rick Porter’s District Court I.

For years (usually at election time) certain people around here express misgivings and anger about the highly successful Pay-Or-Appear Program in Judge Rick Porter’s District Court I.

Recently, the topic reared its ugly head yet again, when the judge’s opponent was quoted as saying Pay or Appear “ … preys on the poorest of the poor.”

Really? Why keep bashing a program that holds people liable for their actions (many of them repeat offenders), and that generates revenue for the county? Remember: Under Pay-Or-Appear, nobody goes to jail if they appear before Judge Porter to explain why they can’t pay a fine. The judge does a fine job of holding lawbreakers’ feet to the fire. Imagine: Lawbreakers actually having to answer to charges the police have filed. But if they’re unable to pay, they can work off the fines through community service.

Somebody explain to me why that’s a bad thing.

Judge Porter’s opponent is spouting the same tired rhetoric as opponents in previous campaigns have: turning over unpaid fines to collection agencies. Well, guess what? That doesn’t work! Need proof? Judge Porter’s predecessor did that, and the county commissioners had to subsidize his courtroom: District Court I was over $1 million in arrears in 2002 when Judge Porter initiated Pay-Or-Appear.

So why do his opponents keep whacking him and a program that’s so obviously effective? Simple. They have no real issues with which to attack him, so they’re manufacturing one.

Re-elect Judge Rick Porter.

Paul Martin

Port Angeles

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 8, 2018

‘Resounding no’ on Carlsborg proposal This is a letter referring to an… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Aug. 1, 2018

Get out the vote, and vote for Wilke I want to encourage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 25, 2018

Fireworks restrictions make sense Presently Clallam County has no restrictions on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 18, 2018

Keep fireworks tradition alive in Clallam I am a resident of Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 11, 2018

Law-breakers should be ‘shown the door’ Ah, good old Bertha Cooper never… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 4, 2018

No true consensus on Sequim fireworks ban Well, if the city councilors… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 27, 2018

Politics, poorly played The present events at our southern border causes one… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Fireworks ban is a wise move We are writing to let you… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading