Who’s been working on the railroad?

Unlike Tim Wheeler in last week’s Gazette (Letters to the Editor, “A prop point clarified,” page A-9), I know Propositions 1 and 2 are not “anti-union” but pro-taxpayer and pro-employee.

Unlike Tim Wheeler in last week’s Gazette (Letters to the Editor, “A prop point clarified,” page A-9), I know Propositions 1 and 2 are not “anti-union” but pro-taxpayer and pro-employee.

Shining the light of day on secret negotiations and giving people a choice to join a union is good for city employees and taxpayers. If any “railroading” or “bullying” is in effect it’s coming from the Sequim City Council and the public employee unions with whom they negotiate.

The most basic expression of citizen involvement is petitioning government by initiative. At least 15 percent of Sequim voters think the initiatives were important enough for them to sign.

Once an initiative has the required number of valid signatures the law is very clear; the city must adopt them directly into law or send them to the ballot to let the voters decide.

Instead, the city council singlehandedly decided the initiatives were invalid, disobeyed the law and did nothing, forcing citizens to file suit and spend money to achieve justice.

By acting irresponsibly, the city council shows they are not a government of the people, by the people and for the people, but instead think we are a people of the government, by the government and for the government.

They are taking taxpayers for a long train ride. Choo-choo-choo-choo and bully for them.

Conservatives don’t advocate for limited government just because it’s the right thing to do; we do it also because it’s the only thing that works in the long run.

Peter Heisel

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 8, 2018

‘Resounding no’ on Carlsborg proposal This is a letter referring to an… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Aug. 1, 2018

Get out the vote, and vote for Wilke I want to encourage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 25, 2018

Fireworks restrictions make sense Presently Clallam County has no restrictions on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 18, 2018

Keep fireworks tradition alive in Clallam I am a resident of Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 11, 2018

Law-breakers should be ‘shown the door’ Ah, good old Bertha Cooper never… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 4, 2018

No true consensus on Sequim fireworks ban Well, if the city councilors… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 27, 2018

Politics, poorly played The present events at our southern border causes one… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Fireworks ban is a wise move We are writing to let you… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading