Why is Socialism bad for U.S.?

First, undress the harmless-sounding title into its former name, “Communism,” and later, “Progressivism.” Both meaning absolute dictatorial rule over the populace. No room for freedom of religion, of personal responsibility; of private enterprise; those things which aliens are swarming here to take advantage of.

Why is Socialism bad for U.S.?

First, undress the harmless-sounding title into its former name, “Communism,” and later, “Progressivism.” Both meaning absolute dictatorial rule over the populace. No room for freedom of religion, of personal responsibility; of private enterprise; those things which aliens are swarming here to take advantage of.

Room only for atheistic secularism: Godless, free of morals and ethics; total dependence on those governing who “despise” the rich, but are them; aiming for all three branches of government, rather than just 2-and-a-half, performing as disloyal socialist ideologues.

Individual responsibility handed over to government for a “one-size-fits-all” regimen; just like the royal governing status – an unintended-consequence – that Marx and Engels despised when dreaming up this ideology.

Business/free enterprise, therefore, employment, totally relegated as income-sources for a government catering to false global warming, as are both federal and state governments.

Millennials in particular, while focusing on latest gee-whiz electronics, have been brainwashed throughout the education system about the sky-is-falling global warming, this a totally false, unscientific device by politicians to sell Socialism.

Liberals, most news media, educators at all levels promote this falsehood.

Democrat apparatchiks spread the approved verbiage in the standard Obama-format of outshouting objections to their official “talking points” shifting the subject when valid arguments raised and name-calling when losing an argument.

Valid, scientific facts are only a mouse-click away.

Paul Hanway

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 8, 2018

‘Resounding no’ on Carlsborg proposal This is a letter referring to an… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Aug. 1, 2018

Get out the vote, and vote for Wilke I want to encourage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 25, 2018

Fireworks restrictions make sense Presently Clallam County has no restrictions on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 18, 2018

Keep fireworks tradition alive in Clallam I am a resident of Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 11, 2018

Law-breakers should be ‘shown the door’ Ah, good old Bertha Cooper never… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 4, 2018

No true consensus on Sequim fireworks ban Well, if the city councilors… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 27, 2018

Politics, poorly played The present events at our southern border causes one… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Fireworks ban is a wise move We are writing to let you… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 13, 2018

A vote for Neupert Dave Neupert needs your vote in the August… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 6, 2018

Showing victims may change discourse It is time we show photos of… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading