Why is Socialism bad for U.S.?

First, undress the harmless-sounding title into its former name, “Communism,” and later, “Progressivism.” Both meaning absolute dictatorial rule over the populace. No room for freedom of religion, of personal responsibility; of private enterprise; those things which aliens are swarming here to take advantage of.

Why is Socialism bad for U.S.?

First, undress the harmless-sounding title into its former name, “Communism,” and later, “Progressivism.” Both meaning absolute dictatorial rule over the populace. No room for freedom of religion, of personal responsibility; of private enterprise; those things which aliens are swarming here to take advantage of.

Room only for atheistic secularism: Godless, free of morals and ethics; total dependence on those governing who “despise” the rich, but are them; aiming for all three branches of government, rather than just 2-and-a-half, performing as disloyal socialist ideologues.

Individual responsibility handed over to government for a “one-size-fits-all” regimen; just like the royal governing status – an unintended-consequence – that Marx and Engels despised when dreaming up this ideology.

Business/free enterprise, therefore, employment, totally relegated as income-sources for a government catering to false global warming, as are both federal and state governments.

Millennials in particular, while focusing on latest gee-whiz electronics, have been brainwashed throughout the education system about the sky-is-falling global warming, this a totally false, unscientific device by politicians to sell Socialism.

Liberals, most news media, educators at all levels promote this falsehood.

Democrat apparatchiks spread the approved verbiage in the standard Obama-format of outshouting objections to their official “talking points” shifting the subject when valid arguments raised and name-calling when losing an argument.

Valid, scientific facts are only a mouse-click away.

Paul Hanway

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

What about the middle school?

I got my ballot for the upcoming School Bond election today (April 7). As I read about the school bond proposal, I saw one glaring omission in planning for the “large number of future students”: What happens in five years when these students graduate from elementary school and go to middle school?

Letter: Vote for Yacklin

My wife and I have known Kim Yacklin for over 20 years. She is exactly what we need in the Auditor's Office, someone who has a high level of understanding of the operations of the county and someone who has the integrity, professionalism and intelligence to run a department.

Letter: Think Positive

The local population, especially in Sequim, is intelligent, well-educated, mostly financially comfortable and old enough to appreciate the prosperity that used to be.

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?

Are you still trying to decide about the Sequim School Bond issue currently before you?