Writer doesn’t understand public infrastructure

All of Jan Richardson’s comments on SARC are excellent and correct (“Some perspectives on SARC clarified,” Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, Aug. 6, page A-11).

All of Jan Richardson’s comments on SARC are excellent and correct (“Some perspectives on SARC clarified,” Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, Aug. 6, page A-11).

Let’s look at SARC from yet another angle: Loren Howerter writes, “Taxpayers should not subsidize SARC” (Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, July 30, page A-10), yet taxpayers made the decision to “pay for swimming” when they set up a special taxing district, like those which operate our schools, our libraries, our county hospital, our parks, our fire and police departments … and other essential public services. Were the voters of 1985 different from today’s?

Why did our citizens vote to tax themselves to build a swimming and exercise facility? I can only surmise, because I wasn’t here for the election, but I can imagine the argument went something like this: Swimming is the exercise that conduces best to all-round good health for virtually all age groups. When the big-muscle sports — baseball, basketball, football, even tennis — are not available to the average middle-aged person and beyond, nor to the tiny ones not yet ready for Little League, swimming is your sport. For the physically disadvantaged, there’s no exercise like moving those limbs in the water.

Also, it’s a good idea for every eighth-grader to learn to swim before moving on to high school. (I don’t think we could accommodate all those kids right now, but it’s a good argument for increasing SARC’s size.) The other exercise media at SARC contribute as well to healthy bodies and minds.

The biggest argument encompasses all these: A community with a swimming pool open to all is a first-class guarantee for a healthy community. These kinds of facilities in turn cut down our overall medical bills … and keeps us healthy taxpayers producing more revenue, longer, for other essentials.

If Mr. Howerter’s reasoning is correct, I know a lot of roads I don’t drive on; a survey might tell us which ones should be up for closure or privatization. And with elections we could try to agree on which ones to close, to save highway funds.

Are we a community or aren’t we?

James R. Huntley

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — May 23, 2018

Another traffic solution Instead of Clallam County spending tens of thousands of… Continue reading

Developer looks to bring 103 homes to Brownfield Road

Plans are tentatively coming before City of Sequim officials to consider a… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Feb. 2, 2017

SEF board supports school levies The Sequim Education Foundation supports both of… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Jan. 18, 2017

Time to pay it forward for schools, students Let’s face it, we… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Dec. 14, 2016

Electoral College has a purpose Regarding John Burbank’s guest opinion article on… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Uphold the ban Presently, Clallam County has a ban on roadside spraying.… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up A couple months before election day,… Continue reading

Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Faustian trade fractures family And so I’m talking on the phone to… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 2, 2016

A vote for Neupert My vote for Superior Court Judge, Position 2,… Continue reading

This week’s letters to the editor

Read this week's "Letters to the Editor" in the green edition of the Sequim Gazette.

Letter: Beware of I-594

France had gun registration. World War II arrived. Germany invaded France, obtained the registration lists, stormed through the country picking up arms, if denied ownership, or refused they were executed on the spot.

Letter: Vote for Yacklin

My wife and I have known Kim Yacklin for over 20 years. She is exactly what we need in the Auditor's Office, someone who has a high level of understanding of the operations of the county and someone who has the integrity, professionalism and intelligence to run a department.