All-or-nothing bond pushed

The cost of the current portion of U.S. Highway 101 widening between Sequim and Port Angeles is $27 million. The cost for the all-or-nothing Sequim school bond is almost six times larger at $154 million.

The cost of the current portion of U.S. Highway 101 widening between Sequim and Port Angeles is $27 million. The cost for the all-or-nothing Sequim school bond is almost six times larger at $154 million.

When examining the reasons for this all-or-nothing bond I see items that I thought were handled through the Maintenance and Operation levies. I do not see anything so crucial as to warrant this type of spending. This all-or-nothing Sequim school bond will increase the school portion of our property taxes by 80 percent and the total overall property taxes by 16 percent.

The current tax base cannot afford this huge increase. It consists primarily of retirees and the service industry. These retirees are living on a fixed income!

Savings, CDs and Treasuries produce no interest and won’t for the foreseeable future! Social Security is changing the rules to keep the COLA as low as possible! The current unemployment rate for Clallam County for January of 2014 is 9.3 percent and has been trending upward since September 2013.

If this all-or-nothing bond passes, it means that the owners of residential and commercial rental properties will pass the additional cost on by increasing the amount of rent! Retirees will have to prioritize spending which means cutting back on current expenses. This will impact the service industry which depends on them to stay in business!

We urge the voters to vote no on this all-or-nothing bond. If there are urgent needs, then the school board must prioritize.

James and Deb Lindgren

Sequim

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 5, 2020

Biden’s VP pick a gamble When you think about it, presumed democratic… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 29, 2020

Online a solid option for Sequim students This has been a difficult… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — July 22, 2020

Cooper’s intimidation column hits the mark My thanks to Bertha Cooper for… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 15, 2020

Thanks to front-line, other health workers A close friend of mine and… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 8, 2020

Immunity for youths should be goal How ironic that as we celebrate… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 1, 2020

Questions remain with sewer project payment I’m writing in response to the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 17, 2020

Armed groups should carry responsibility I believe it is time to discuss… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 10, 2020

A tale of two fiddlers Legend and history have it that Nero… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 3, 2020

Consider the source A recent letter about estimates of the death toll… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — May 27, 2020

Heartening to see lunch giveaway I feel fortunate to live in Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 20, 2020

Predictions fair poorly How can pundits be so spectacularly wrong in their… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 6, 2020

Local nonprofit hurt by funding policy While Payroll Protection Plan relaunched this… Continue reading