Covering SARC’s financial tail

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

No one enjoys receiving their tax bill; and have no desire to fill the cavernous deficits taxing agencies have created. Here, intentions are to give reference to our community-owned recreational center’s (SARC’s) financial future.

The Sequim Aquatic Recreational Center was built with good intentions to provide a community swimming pool for the health and safety of kids and adults. However, from the beginning, there’s been a misconception of self-sufficiency; this was an unfortunate statement of past considerations, causing consternation within the community. An observation: Of the tens of tens of thousands of public swimming pools in the U.S., for practicality, none are self-sufficient!

When economics were good, SARC saved (sometimes unwisely) and those savings kept SARC operating at industrial standards for the past 13 years without our tax monies. Recently, after professional inquiries into SARC’s structural, mechanical and financial health, it became apparent a levy, to supplement user fees, has to be asked. Without a levy (this is no threat) RCWs (Revised Code of Washington laws) state that SARC can’t run a deficit! If SARC can’t meet its pecuniary (financial) obligations, our community pool will be closed!

The management of our recreational center understands the difficulty of adding another burden on the community, but after deliberation, believes that a six-year levy, at a minimal cost of 12 cents per $1,000 (assessed valuation), is more than offset by the total social value SARC provides to the greater Sequim community.

We, the taxpayers and SARC’s management will have an opportunity to converse and exchange ideas at 5:30 p.m. July 23 in an open forum in SARC’s gym, 610 N. Fifth Ave.

Jan Richardson

Sequim

Richardson is a SARC board member.

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor — May 27, 2020

Heartening to see lunch giveaway I feel fortunate to live in Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 20, 2020

Predictions fair poorly How can pundits be so spectacularly wrong in their… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 6, 2020

Local nonprofit hurt by funding policy While Payroll Protection Plan relaunched this… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 29, 2020

Don’t stop now During this critical time for our community with the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 22, 2020

Consider alternative to roundabout In the April 15 edition of the Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — April 15, 2020

Roundabout isn’t solution for intersection An April 8 Sequim Gazette article states… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor – March 25, 2020

For our safety’s sake, limit visits to peninsula I live on the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — March 18, 2020

Time to ‘buck up’ Who came up with COVID-19? It originated in… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — March 4, 2020

Kudos to Crecelius I recently read your article about Eric Crecelius retiring… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Feb. 26, 2020

Thanks for the holiday cheer A quick thank you to the City… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Feb. 12, 2020

Reconsider location for MAT facility When I first moved to Sequim in… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Feb. 5, 2020

Clinic suggestion is ‘absurd and silly’ Robert Falk’s “Move the Mat?” (Letters… Continue reading