Letters to the Editor — Sequim Gazette, Nov. 23, 2016

Fourth Estate needs to step up

A couple months before election day, the Peninsula Daily News published a short letter to the editor explaining how the U.S. Government operates, i.e., “the president proposes and the Congress disposes.”

For the past six years, almost whatever the President proposed, the Congress summarily trashed (“disposed”), led by Sen. (Mitch) McConnell and Rep. (John) Boehner and their ilk.

But now, even though Washington state voted “blue,” many more states voted “red,” so Trump won the Electoral College vote but not the USA’s popular vote.

Some readers might not know that our democracy is based on checks and balances, honest disagreement and compromise among our elected leaders to achieve the best interests of and security for our nation and its citizens.

The following word picture exemplifies the adage: “Be careful what you wish for” — because there will be no checks and balances in the federal executive and legislative branches nor in the judicial branch, beginning in 2017.

That could leave us with the original intent of “All men are created equal,” which was “all property-owning white males are created equal.” All others (in 1791) had no rights.

From 1791-2012, USA’s citizens had progressed enormously in civil rights: electing a black president twice; women can vote, hold elective office, have a legal abortion; accepting gay marriages; widely accepting all minorities with rights to hold elective offices; and protection by The Rule of Law, to name a few.

I am seriously concerned that much of (all of?) our civil rights progress in 225 years for all our citizens and our Athenian democracy may be at risk.

With no checks and balances in our 2017 governmental system, one might ask, is the USA too big to fail? The Roman Empire thought so in 476 AD, as did the USSR in 1991.

The only checks and balances remaining for the people is the Fourth Estate. Question: Will this entity speak out to protect citizens’ civil rights?

Richard Hahn

Sequim

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — July 8, 2020

Immunity for youths should be goal How ironic that as we celebrate… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 1, 2020

Questions remain with sewer project payment I’m writing in response to the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 17, 2020

Armed groups should carry responsibility I believe it is time to discuss… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 10, 2020

A tale of two fiddlers Legend and history have it that Nero… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 3, 2020

Consider the source A recent letter about estimates of the death toll… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — May 27, 2020

Heartening to see lunch giveaway I feel fortunate to live in Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 20, 2020

Predictions fair poorly How can pundits be so spectacularly wrong in their… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 6, 2020

Local nonprofit hurt by funding policy While Payroll Protection Plan relaunched this… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 29, 2020

Don’t stop now During this critical time for our community with the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 22, 2020

Consider alternative to roundabout In the April 15 edition of the Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — April 15, 2020

Roundabout isn’t solution for intersection An April 8 Sequim Gazette article states… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor – March 25, 2020

For our safety’s sake, limit visits to peninsula I live on the… Continue reading