Porter earns my vote

For years (usually at election time) certain people around here express misgivings and anger about the highly successful Pay-Or-Appear Program in Judge Rick Porter’s District Court I.

For years (usually at election time) certain people around here express misgivings and anger about the highly successful Pay-Or-Appear Program in Judge Rick Porter’s District Court I.

Recently, the topic reared its ugly head yet again, when the judge’s opponent was quoted as saying Pay or Appear “ … preys on the poorest of the poor.”

Really? Why keep bashing a program that holds people liable for their actions (many of them repeat offenders), and that generates revenue for the county? Remember: Under Pay-Or-Appear, nobody goes to jail if they appear before Judge Porter to explain why they can’t pay a fine. The judge does a fine job of holding lawbreakers’ feet to the fire. Imagine: Lawbreakers actually having to answer to charges the police have filed. But if they’re unable to pay, they can work off the fines through community service.

Somebody explain to me why that’s a bad thing.

Judge Porter’s opponent is spouting the same tired rhetoric as opponents in previous campaigns have: turning over unpaid fines to collection agencies. Well, guess what? That doesn’t work! Need proof? Judge Porter’s predecessor did that, and the county commissioners had to subsidize his courtroom: District Court I was over $1 million in arrears in 2002 when Judge Porter initiated Pay-Or-Appear.

So why do his opponents keep whacking him and a program that’s so obviously effective? Simple. They have no real issues with which to attack him, so they’re manufacturing one.

Re-elect Judge Rick Porter.

Paul Martin

Port Angeles

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — July 8, 2020

Immunity for youths should be goal How ironic that as we celebrate… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 1, 2020

Questions remain with sewer project payment I’m writing in response to the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 17, 2020

Armed groups should carry responsibility I believe it is time to discuss… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 10, 2020

A tale of two fiddlers Legend and history have it that Nero… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 3, 2020

Consider the source A recent letter about estimates of the death toll… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — May 27, 2020

Heartening to see lunch giveaway I feel fortunate to live in Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 20, 2020

Predictions fair poorly How can pundits be so spectacularly wrong in their… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 6, 2020

Local nonprofit hurt by funding policy While Payroll Protection Plan relaunched this… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 29, 2020

Don’t stop now During this critical time for our community with the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — April 22, 2020

Consider alternative to roundabout In the April 15 edition of the Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — April 15, 2020

Roundabout isn’t solution for intersection An April 8 Sequim Gazette article states… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor – March 25, 2020

For our safety’s sake, limit visits to peninsula I live on the… Continue reading