Some perspectives on SARC clarified

A rebuttal to Mr. Howerter’s letter, “Taxpayers should not subsidize SARC” (Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, July 30, page A-10)

A rebuttal to Mr. Howerter’s letter, “Taxpayers should not subsidize SARC” (Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, July 30, page A-10): “ … special interest group claiming they deserve a subsidy from the population at large.” Sequim Aquatic Recreation Center was formed for and by that “population at large.” Bowling alleys, movie theaters and restaurants that go out of business are private enterprises and therefore not subsidized with public funds, as Mr. Howerter implies.

Question of demonstration: Mr. Howerter wrote, “A facility used by only a minority of the community should ‘pay its own way.’” Does that include the library, fire department and OMC?

Mr. Howerter goes on, “SARC should be required to operate by the same (company) standard.” Distinction: Private businesses provide the ability to gain personal wealth. SARC is a taxing entity formed to provide monetary support for the population at large swimming pool!

“Operating standards”: SARC is governed by state statutes and held to a higher financial and legal standard than most private citizens.

Mr. Howerter’s last comment was, “If SARC can’t remain solvent without taxpayer’s subsidy, it should close and sell its facilities to a private company.” To be sold, Sequim would have to be four times its present population to be profitable for a national franchiser to acquire.

Most importantly and often forgotten, Sequim Aquatic Recreation Center was known, as are 99 percent of all other public swimming pools, not to be self-supporting. That was true in 1985 and remains true to this day.

If more people had attended SARC’s seminar on July 23, maybe the population at large would better understand the difference between Business and Government!

Jan Richardson

Sequim

(Richardson is a SARC board member.)

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Aug. 5, 2020

Biden’s VP pick a gamble When you think about it, presumed democratic… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 29, 2020

Online a solid option for Sequim students This has been a difficult… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — July 22, 2020

Cooper’s intimidation column hits the mark My thanks to Bertha Cooper for… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 15, 2020

Thanks to front-line, other health workers A close friend of mine and… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 8, 2020

Immunity for youths should be goal How ironic that as we celebrate… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — July 1, 2020

Questions remain with sewer project payment I’m writing in response to the… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 17, 2020

Armed groups should carry responsibility I believe it is time to discuss… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 10, 2020

A tale of two fiddlers Legend and history have it that Nero… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — June 3, 2020

Consider the source A recent letter about estimates of the death toll… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — May 27, 2020

Heartening to see lunch giveaway I feel fortunate to live in Sequim… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 20, 2020

Predictions fair poorly How can pundits be so spectacularly wrong in their… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — May 6, 2020

Local nonprofit hurt by funding policy While Payroll Protection Plan relaunched this… Continue reading