Some perspectives on SARC clarified

A rebuttal to Mr. Howerter’s letter, “Taxpayers should not subsidize SARC” (Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, July 30, page A-10)

A rebuttal to Mr. Howerter’s letter, “Taxpayers should not subsidize SARC” (Letters to the Editor, Sequim Gazette, July 30, page A-10): “ … special interest group claiming they deserve a subsidy from the population at large.” Sequim Aquatic Recreation Center was formed for and by that “population at large.” Bowling alleys, movie theaters and restaurants that go out of business are private enterprises and therefore not subsidized with public funds, as Mr. Howerter implies.

Question of demonstration: Mr. Howerter wrote, “A facility used by only a minority of the community should ‘pay its own way.’” Does that include the library, fire department and OMC?

Mr. Howerter goes on, “SARC should be required to operate by the same (company) standard.” Distinction: Private businesses provide the ability to gain personal wealth. SARC is a taxing entity formed to provide monetary support for the population at large swimming pool!

“Operating standards”: SARC is governed by state statutes and held to a higher financial and legal standard than most private citizens.

Mr. Howerter’s last comment was, “If SARC can’t remain solvent without taxpayer’s subsidy, it should close and sell its facilities to a private company.” To be sold, Sequim would have to be four times its present population to be profitable for a national franchiser to acquire.

Most importantly and often forgotten, Sequim Aquatic Recreation Center was known, as are 99 percent of all other public swimming pools, not to be self-supporting. That was true in 1985 and remains true to this day.

If more people had attended SARC’s seminar on July 23, maybe the population at large would better understand the difference between Business and Government!

Jan Richardson

Sequim

(Richardson is a SARC board member.)

 

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor — Jan. 20, 2021

Kudos to tribe A huge round of applause to the Jamestown S’Klallam… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Dec. 30, 2020

Treaties key in dealing with weapons threat We need treaties that will… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Dec. 23, 2020

Give room for roadway safety I ride with the local Easy Riders… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Dec. 16, 2020

Respect for for law enforcement, lessons During World War II in 1944,… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Dec. 9, 2020

Replace hate with kindness Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in the November… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Nov. 5, 2020

An unexpected blessing In this time of hopes cut short, plans changed… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Nov. 18, 2020

Reinstate our administrators I recently retired after 38 years working as a… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Nov. 11, 2020

Board should expedite principal investigation I taught in the Sequim School District… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Nov. 4, 2020

Support for Langston I read last week’s front page story in disbelief.… Continue reading

Letters To The Editor — Oct. 14, 2020

Guidelines a ‘contradiction’ Let’s see if I have this right: in March… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor — Oct. 7, 2020

Beautiful flower baskets once again The flower baskets were better than ever this… Continue reading

Letters to the editor — Sept. 30, 2020

Vote for our democracy Vote, but vote for the candidate you feel… Continue reading