Guest opinion: Move forward on water quality standards

Guest opinion: Move forward on water quality standards

In an unfortunate reversal, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has decided to reconsider our state’s new water quality standards – the most protective in the nation – based on an industry trade group petition that argues the rules will increase their cost of doing business.

Treaty Indian tribes in western Washington believe a pollution-based economy is not sustainable and that no price can be placed on the value of human health or the resources that sustain us.

It’s been less than two years since EPA stepped into the rulemaking process to ensure that our water quality standards are based on the best available science. The federal Clean Water Act requires states to develop rules that ensure our waters are clean enough to provide healthy fish and shellfish that are safe to eat.

Water quality standards include human health criteria based on how much fish and shellfish we eat. The more we eat, the cleaner the water must be. Two numbers drive the standards: our fish consumption rate and our cancer risk rate from eating local seafood.

For more than 25 years the state used a fish consumption rate of only 6.5 grams per day – or about one big bite – to determine water quality standards. The cancer risk rate from consuming toxics in seafood was set at one in 1 million.

After EPA got involved, Washington’s water quality standards were revised about 18 months ago to include a more realistic fish consumption rate of 175 grams (about 6 ounces) per day. The cancer risk rate remained unchanged.

The updated water quality standards were the result of years of extensive public processes at the state and federal levels, involving tribal governments as well as industry representatives, environmental groups and other stakeholders. The standards are based on science that accurately reflects what happens when we are exposed to pollution in our waters. They also include a wide range of implementation tools and generous timelines for implementation.

Now our hard-fought gains to protect human health are threatened.

There is no new science or law that justifies EPA’s reconsideration or that would lead to a different result. EPA’s response to industry’s petition is simply an agreement to participate in rehashing issues and concerns that were discussed, debated and resolved through lengthy rule-making and public process that spanned decades.

What has changed is the current anti-regulation approach to a strong economy. We believe that human health and environmental quality are the keys to economic health.

We agree with Maia Bellon, director of the state Department of Ecology, who told EPA that she opposes any reconsideration of the current water quality rules: “What Washington State’s communities and businesses need the most right now is predictability, certainty and flexibility to meet clean water requirements. We are well on the path of providing just that.”

We also agree with Gov. Jay Inslee, who said in 2015: “We will not fall victim to the fear mongers who have attempted to block every clean-air and clean-water law since Earth Day 1970 by arguing we cannot have a healthy environment and a healthy economy. They have been wrong every time.”

For 17 days we all watched with great sadness as a grieving mother orca carried her dead calf around the Salish Sea. Toxins in our water and fish are part of that story. Those orcas are us, the late tribal leader Billy Frank Jr. would say. What happens to them will one day happen to us.

Lorraine Loomis is Chair of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. See www.nwifc.org.

Guest opinion: Move forward on water quality standards
Guest opinion: Move forward on water quality standards

More in Opinion

Bertha Cooper
Think About It: Goodbye, Charlie

“I love helping a community be what it wants to be,” says… Continue reading

Guest opinion: Where is the accountability?

The thread that seems to run through Bertha Cooper’s opinion piece in… Continue reading

Crystal Linn
Aging Successfully: We really do need each other

In my opinion the person, who created the phrase “social distancing” should… Continue reading

Guest column: UW scholars program can help next generation build strong communities

A large majority of youth across a wide spectrum of races, cultures… Continue reading

Don Brunell
Guest column: Removing Snake River dams is unwise

Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson’s $33 billion plan to remove the lower Snake… Continue reading

Kris Johnson is president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s chamber of commerce and manufacturers association.
Guest opinion: January windstorm is reminder of value of diverse energy sources

A windstorm swept through Washington state last month, doing damage on both… Continue reading

Bertha Cooper
Think About It: A shot in the arm

Of all the news coming out of Sequim, the best news is… Continue reading

Being Frank: Increased outdoor recreation impacting tribal treaty rights, resources

Already robust levels of hiking, camping, boating and every other kind of… Continue reading

x
Guest column: Reflecting on 40 years of federal recognition

Editor’s note: This column was originally printed in the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe’s… Continue reading

Don Brunell
Guest opinion: Portland carbon tax may doom recyclers

In 1971, Oregon was the first state to enact a “bottle bill.”… Continue reading

Guest Opinion: Time to end spread of QAnon, similar conspiracies

My seventh great grandmother, Phebe Wilde Day, was imprisoned as a suspected… Continue reading

x
From the Back Nine: Old dogs

I have officially stopped jumping on new communication band wagons. It’s not… Continue reading